Bernie Sanders' AI regulation push with Chinese scientists ignites national security debate

7 Sources

Share

Senator Bernie Sanders hosted a Capitol Hill panel with leading Chinese scientists to advocate for international cooperation on AI regulation, calling artificial intelligence a 'runaway train with no brakes.' The event sparked fierce backlash from conservatives, investors, and lawmakers who questioned the wisdom of partnering with a foreign adversary on critical technology policy.

Bernie Sanders Calls for International Cooperation on AI Regulation

Senator Bernie Sanders convened a controversial panel on Capitol Hill this week, bringing together leading Chinese scientists to discuss what he described as the existential risks posed by unregulated artificial intelligence. The Vermont independent warned that AI has become a "runaway train with no brakes," built by the world's richest and most powerful people who "acknowledge that they don't understand how it works, and they don't know where it's headed"

1

. Sanders advocated for international cooperation similar to Cold War-era nuclear pacts, arguing that global dialogue is essential to address AI safety concerns that transcend national borders.

Source: Axios

Source: Axios

The panel featured Xue Lan of Tsinghua University and Zeng Yi of the Beijing Institute of AI Safety and Governance, alongside MIT professor Max Tegmark. During the discussion, Sanders raised concerns about misinformation, data privacy losses, social isolation among adolescents dependent on chatbots, and the potential for massive job displacement through automation

1

. Tegmark noted the emergence of what he called "the Bernie to Bannon coalition," referring to unlikely political alliances forming around AI skepticism, and specifically criticized how chatbots may harm young people

2

.

Chinese Researchers Challenge AI Arms Race Narrative

Xue Lan from Tsinghua University pushed back against the dominant framing of US-China AI competition, stating that "the first thing we have to change is the inaccurate narrative that the U.S. and China are engaged in AI race"

2

. He characterized the situation instead as "a global race to see who can really develop the best model that can be safe and reliable," while acknowledging real geopolitical rivalry exists. Lan argued for "safe zones" for US-China AI cooperation and warned against a world where "only few countries and few companies have the most powerful tool but the rest of the world is impoverished with nothing"

1

.

Panelists called on scientists in both countries to work together to establish global safety standards, even as trillions of dollars pour into an AI arms race with no clear finish line. The researchers presented concerns about super-intelligent systems potentially operating outside the bounds of their designers' instructions, highlighting the technical uncertainties that accompany rapid AI development

1

.

Fierce Backlash Over National Security Concerns

The optics of Sanders partnering with Chinese academics triggered immediate criticism from conservative lawmakers, investors, and commentators who questioned the wisdom of involving a foreign adversary in shaping U.S. technology policy. House Intelligence Chair Rick Crawford called Bernie Sanders a "threat to national security" and described him as a "communist" who "embraces Chinese communism"

4

. Crawford referenced Sanders' history of visiting the Soviet Union during the Cold War as evidence of his ideological leanings.

Source: New York Post

Source: New York Post

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promoted an America-first agenda, writing that "the United States is home to the most talented AI researchers in the world" and arguing that "the real threat to AI safety is letting any nation other than the United States set the global standard"

1

. Michael Sobolik of the Hudson Institute acknowledged that questions about child safety, community impact, and job displacement deserve attention, but insisted "what we shouldn't do is partner with foreign adversaries like the Chinese Communist Party in those discussions"

1

.

Investor Kevin O'Leary warned on Fox News that China is rapidly expanding power generation and AI data centers to strengthen both its economy and military capabilities. "China is our adversary," O'Leary said. "We can't let the Chinese beat us in AI." He dismissed Sanders' international approach as "dangerously misguided," stating "Bernie, I get it. He's very, very good at sound bites, but he's way offside on this one"

5

.

Source: Benzinga

Source: Benzinga

Sanders' Broader Campaign Against AI Expansion

This panel represents the latest salvo in Bernie Sanders' broader campaign to slow down AI development in the United States. In March, Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, which would halt new construction of AI data centers until national safety regulations and safeguards protect workers, consumers, and the environment

1

4

. Sanders stated at the time that "AI and robotics are creating the most sweeping technological revolution in the history of humanity" and criticized Congress for being "way behind where it should be in understanding the nature of this revolution and its impacts."

Sanders is bucking moderate thinking on AI by rejecting the competitive race-with-China frame that dominates both major parties. While the race against China is often framed as technology falling into authoritarian versus democratic hands, pushback is growing in the U.S. over AI-powered surveillance and innovation concerns

2

. The Alliance for Secure AI CEO Brendan Steinhauser noted that AI safety is expected on the agenda for an upcoming summit between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, emphasizing that "when the U.S. government talks to China about AI, it must do so from a position of strength"

2

.

The debate highlights fundamental tensions between those prioritizing rapid innovation to maintain technological leadership and those advocating for slowing down AI development to address existential risks, geopolitics, and societal impacts including automation-driven job displacement. The U.S. has generally taken a market-oriented approach to AI regulation aimed at protecting innovation, while China has relied on tighter government control. In 2025, both the U.S. and U.K. declined to sign a global AI safety declaration at the AI Action Summit in Paris, while nearly 60 countries including China, India, and Germany supported the nonbinding agreement promoting safe and trustworthy artificial intelligence

5

.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo
Youtube logo
© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved