Gen Z workers admit over-relying on AI is eroding their skills and critical thinking

2 Sources

Share

A new study from GoTo and Workplace Intelligence reveals that 62% of Gen Z workers admit to over-relying on AI at work, with 46% believing the technology is actively making them less intelligent. The research highlights a workforce caught between pressure to adopt AI for productivity and the risk of losing essential skills and human judgment in the process.

Gen Z Faces a Skills Crisis as AI Dependency Deepens

Gen Z workers are sounding the alarm about their relationship with AI in the workplace. According to the 2026 Pulse of Work report from GoTo and Workplace Intelligence, which surveyed 2,500 global employees and IT leaders, 62% of Gen Z admit to over-relying on AI—the highest rate among all age groups

1

. Even more concerning, 40% of young workers say they can't get by without the technology, revealing a dependency that could undermine their career trajectories before they've truly begun

1

.

Source: Fast Company

Source: Fast Company

The consequences extend beyond convenience. Nearly half of Gen Z workers—46%—believe their over-reliance on AI is actively eroding their skills and making them less intelligent

2

. Across all workers, 39% share this concern, while 50% of employees now acknowledge they rely on AI too much

2

. This isn't a fringe worry—it's becoming the quiet consensus of a workforce that adopted AI fast and is now reckoning with what it means for skill development and critical thinking abilities.

The Pressure to Embrace AI Outpaces Training and Guardrails

The rush to integrate AI in the workplace is creating conditions where workers feel compelled to use the technology whether it makes sense or not. Sixty percent of employees report feeling pressured to use AI tools to boost productivity regardless of whether the task calls for it

2

. Some companies, like Amazon, actively encourage "tokenmaxxing"—using as many AI tokens as possible among workers

1

.

This pressure, absent proper training and policies, is leading to risky behavior. Seventy percent of employees now admit they've used AI for sensitive or high-stakes tasks, including legal or compliance work, decisions requiring emotional intelligence, and actions involving confidential information—a jump from 54% just one year ago

2

. These are precisely the domains where human judgment remains irreplaceable and where AI errors carry the highest cost.

GoTo CEO Rich Veldran told Fortune that the challenge is especially acute for younger workers trying to learn the ropes. "It's only in the rearview mirror that folks will look back and say, 'You know what, I'm actually relying on it too much. Perhaps I'm not learning some of the things I need to learn,'" he explained

1

. A 2025 Microsoft study supports this concern, finding that leaning too heavily on AI tools is associated with weaker critical thinking

1

.

The Career Development Dilemma: Adopt or Get Left Behind

Gen Z finds itself navigating a paradox. Some young workers are actively sabotaging their company's AI rollout out of fear the technology will eliminate their jobs, according to research from enterprise AI firm Writer

1

. Veldran noted this anxiety stems from a troubling realization: if AI can perform the tasks they're paid to do, workers risk proving their own irrelevance. "There's also the fear of if you depend too much on [AI] what you're doing isn't as valuable," he said, "if what you're really doing is just extracting answers from AI and not adding a lot of other personal value. Anybody can do that"

1

.

Source: Fortune

Source: Fortune

Yet resistance carries its own risks. A separate Workplace Intelligence survey found that employers are reserving raises for workers leading the charge on AI adoption. "The super-users we surveyed were around 3x more likely to have received both a promotion and pay raise in the past year, compared to employees who have been slow to adopt these tools," said Dan Schawbel, managing partner at Workplace Intelligence

1

.

The threat of job displacement isn't hypothetical. More than 40% of CEOs plan to cut junior roles anyway, according to a recent survey from consulting firm Oliver Wyman—the same junior roles that young workers depend on to start their career climb

1

. Interestingly, a recent Gartner study found no difference in worker productivity returns between AI-enabled companies that have cut workers and those that haven't, suggesting job cuts may not deliver the efficiency gains employers expect

1

.

Striking the Balance Between AI for Productivity and Human Expertise

Veldran emphasized that growing in an AI-enabled company requires a delicate balance between AI adoption and developing one's own expertise. "Use AI to take work out of the system because it does a tremendous job of that," he advised. "Don't cede to it all human judgment"

1

. He framed the challenge as a generational reckoning: "You haven't had those experiences necessarily where you're formulating a strategy, you had to do the work yourself, you had to earn your stripes. You learn from those experiences and that gives you confidence as you move up the chain"

1

.

The research suggests that companies encouraging workers to integrate AI—rather than replacing them outright—may be making the smarter play. But for Gen Z, the path forward remains uncertain: either adopt the technology and risk growing dependent on it, or resist it and get left behind

1

. What's clear is that the 16-percentage-point jump in just one year of employees using AI for high-stakes tasks signals this problem isn't resolving on its own

2

.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo
Youtube logo
© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved