3 Sources
[1]
Gen Z is over-relying on AI at work -- and it could cost them their careers | Fortune
AI was supposed to make workers more capable. For some, it's doing the opposite. Half of workers today admit they're over-reliant on AI, according to a new study from software company GoTo and Workplace Intelligence, a research agency focused on the nature of work. The 2026 Pulse of Work report -- a survey of 2,500 respondents of both knowledge workers and IT managers on AI deployment -- found that Gen Z workers were especially likely to treat the tech as a crutch, and 62% admitted to it. Some young workers think that overreliance has crossed a critical turning point: 40% say they can't get by without the technology. GoTo CEO Rich Veldran told Fortune an overreliance on AI poses a sticky dilemma, especially for younger workers looking to learn the ropes. "It's only in the rearview mirror that folks will look back and say, 'You know what, I'm actually relying on it too much. Perhaps I'm not learning some of the things I need to learn,'" he said. While AI takes over more work functions, firms are pushing the tech on employees regardless of their comfort using it. Some, like Amazon, even encourage "tokenmaxxing," or using as many AI tokens (the basic building block of AI prompts) among workers as possible. But according to Veldran, growing in an AI-enabled company requires a delicate balance between adopting the technology and developing one's own expertise and skill set. "Use AI to take work out of the system because it does a tremendous job of that," Veldran said. "Don't cede to it all human judgment." Striking that balance is important not just for career development but for cognitive ability. A 2025 Microsoft study found that leaning too heavily on AI tools is associated with weaker critical thinking. There's also a brewing tension between managers and workers around AI adoption. Some Gen Z workers today are actively sabotaging their company's AI rollout out of fear the technology will take their job, according to a study from enterprise AI firm Writer. Veldran said that's a conflict that showed up in GoTo's survey results as well. He said the anxiety stems from the belief that workers will prove their irrelevance if AI can do the tasks they're paid to perform. "There's also the fear of if you depend too much on [AI] what you're doing isn't as valuable," he said, "if what you're really doing is just extracting answers from AI and not adding a lot of other personal value. Anybody can do that." There's growing evidence that encouraging workers to integrate AI -- rather than replacing them outright -- may be the smarter play. A recent Gartner study found no difference in productivity returns between AI-enabled companies that have cut workers and those that haven't. Meanwhile, some employers report reserving raises for workers who are leading the charge on AI adoption, according to a separate Workplace Intelligence survey. "The super-users we surveyed were around 3x more likely to have received both a promotion and pay raise in the past year, compared to employees who have been slow to adopt these tools," Dan Schawbel, managing partner at Workplace Intelligence, said in a statement. Still, fears of displacement aren't without basis. Regardless of whether or not AI-related layoffs increase company returns, more than 40% of CEOs plan to cut junior roles anyway, according to a recent survey of executives from consulting firm Oliver Wyman, the same junior roles that young workers take to start their climb up the company ladder. That leaves Gen Z in a tough spot: either adopt the technology and risk growing dependent on it, or resist it and get left behind. Veldran framed it as a generational reckoning. "You haven't had those experiences necessarily where you're formulating a strategy, you had to do the work yourself, you had to earn your stripes," he said. "You learn from those experiences and that gives you confidence as you move up the chain."
[2]
Almost half of Gen Z says AI is making them dumber
New research from GoTo, conducted in partnership with Workplace Intelligence, surveyed 2,500 global employees and IT leaders on AI use and sentiment. The findings tell a story about a workforce caught between the tools that help them and the habits those tools are forming. Fifty percent of employees now say they rely on AI too much. Thirty percent say they can no longer function without it. And 39% believe their overreliance on AI is actively eroding their skills and making them less intelligent, a number that climbs to 46% among Gen Z workers. These aren't fringe opinions. They are the quiet consensus of a workforce that adopted AI fast and is now reckoning with the consequences. The Pressure to Use AI Is Outrunning the Guardrails to Use It Well One of the clearest findings in the research is how much external pressure is shaping AI behavior at work. Sixty percent of employees say they feel pressured to use AI tools to boost productivity regardless of whether the task calls for it. That pressure, absent the right training and policies, is a setup for misuse. The numbers bear this out. Seventy percent of employees (up from 54% just a year ago) admit they've used AI for sensitive or high-stakes tasks, including legal or compliance work, decisions requiring emotional intelligence, and actions involving confidential information. These are exactly the domains where human judgment is most irreplaceable, and where AI errors carry the highest cost. The fact that this number jumped 16 percentage points in a single year suggests the problem isn't slowing down on its own.
[3]
'Can't work without AI': Employees fear rising overreliance, skill-loss - The Economic Times
A new report reveals that half of surveyed workers feel overly dependent on AI, with younger generations expressing greater concern about probable diminished intelligence. Despite pressure to use AI for productivity, many lack understanding of its practical application, leading to increased "workslop" and misuse on sensitive tasks.About 50% of the 2,500 workers surveyed said they depend too much on artificial intelligence (AI) tools at work, according to a new report by cloud communications and IT company GoTo, highlighting growing concerns over AI overreliance, affecting employee confidence, skills and decision-making. The 'Pulse of Work 2026' report said that the workers "feel they can't function without it." Nearly four in 10 workers said overusing AI was making them less intelligent. Younger workers most concerned The report found younger workers were more likely to feel the negative effects of AI dependence. Nearly half of Gen Z respondents, or 46%, said relying too much on AI was making them less intelligent. Pressure to use AI at work also appears to be increasing. Around 60% of employees said they felt expected to use AI tools to improve productivity. However, about 69% said they were not very familiar with how AI could be applied practically in their role, while 80% believed they were not using AI to its full potential. AI misuse and "workslop" rising The report highlighted growing concerns around the misuse of AI in workplaces. Around 70% of employees admitted to using AI for sensitive or high-stakes tasks, up sharply from 54% last year. These included legal or compliance work, emotionally sensitive tasks, safety-related work, strategic decisions and handling confidential information. Unchecked AI-generated content is also creating additional work for employees. Around 43% of respondents said they had used AI-generated material despite suspecting it contained errors or false information. Most workers surveyed, about 77%, said AI-generated work often took longer to review than human-produced work. Around 66% said reviewing low-quality AI-generated content, described in the report as "workslop", was creating more work for them. AI training and policies The study found many organisations still lacked clear AI policies and training programmes. Only 44% of IT leaders said their company even had an AI policy in place. Even where policies existed, around 80% of employees and 60% of IT leaders said workers were not being properly trained to use AI tools responsibly. "The opportunity in front of us with AI is enormous. Employees are spending an estimated 2.6 hours every day on tasks that AI could handle, and in the US alone, that translates to more than $2.9 trillion in potential efficiency gains annually," said Rich Veldran, CEO of GoTo. "Responsible AI use is about having the right tools and supporting the people who use them," said Dan Schawbel, managing partner at research firm Workplace Intelligence, which partnered with GoTo on the report. "Our research highlights the importance of equipping employees with the skills, policies, and guidance they need to work alongside AI effectively."
Share
Copy Link
A new study reveals half of workers admit they're overly dependent on AI, with 62% of Gen Z acknowledging over-reliance. Nearly half of young workers believe excessive AI use is making them less intelligent, raising concerns about critical thinking abilities and long-term career development as pressure to adopt AI in the workplace intensifies.
Half of workers today admit they're overly dependent on AI tools at work, according to the 2026 Pulse of Work report from software company GoTo and research agency Workplace Intelligence
1
. The survey of 2,500 knowledge workers and IT managers found that Gen Z workers were especially vulnerable, with 62% acknowledging their over-reliance on the technology1
. More troubling still, 40% of young workers say they can't work without AI, suggesting dependency has reached a critical threshold1
.
Source: Fast Company
Nearly 39% of employees believe their AI over-reliance is actively eroding their skills and making them less intelligent, a figure that climbs to 46% among Gen Z workers
2
. This isn't a fringe concern but rather a quiet consensus emerging across the workforce. The anxiety extends beyond perceived skill loss to fundamental cognitive abilities. A 2025 Microsoft study found that leaning too heavily on AI tools is associated with weaker critical thinking abilities1
. Rich Veldran, CEO of GoTo, told Fortune that this poses a particularly sticky dilemma for younger workers trying to learn the ropes early in their careers1
.Sixty percent of employees report feeling pressured to use AI tools to boost productivity regardless of whether tasks actually require it
2
. This pressure exists despite significant gaps in understanding: about 69% of workers say they're not very familiar with how AI could be applied practically in their role, while 80% believe they're not using AI to its full potential3
. The lack of proper employee training compounds the problem. Only 44% of IT leaders say their company even has AI policies in place, and where policies exist, 80% of employees and 60% of IT leaders report workers aren't being properly trained to use AI tools responsibly3
.
Source: ET
Seventy percent of employees now admit to using AI for sensitive or high-stakes tasks, up sharply from 54% just a year ago
2
. These include legal or compliance work, decisions requiring emotional intelligence, and handling confidential information—exactly the domains where human judgment is most irreplaceable2
. The consequences are tangible. Around 43% of respondents admitted to using AI-generated material despite suspecting it contained errors or false information3
. This unchecked AI-generated content is creating what researchers call "workslop"—low-quality output that requires extensive review. About 77% of workers say AI-generated work often takes longer to review than human-produced work, with 66% reporting that reviewing workslop is creating more work for them3
.Related Stories

Source: Fortune
Gen Z faces a difficult choice: adopt the technology and risk growing dependent on it, or resist and get left behind. Some young workers are actively sabotaging their company's AI rollout out of fear the technology will take their job, according to a study from enterprise AI firm Writer
1
. Veldran noted this anxiety stems from the belief that workers will prove their irrelevance if AI can do the tasks they're paid to perform1
. These fears aren't without basis. More than 40% of CEOs plan to cut junior roles anyway, according to a recent survey from consulting firm Oliver Wyman—the same junior roles that young workers take to start their climb up the company ladder1
.Despite the risks, there's growing evidence that encouraging workers to integrate AI—rather than replacing them outright—may be the smarter play. A recent Gartner study found no difference in productivity returns between AI-enabled companies that have cut workers and those that haven't
1
. Some employers report reserving raises for workers leading the charge on AI adoption. Super-users surveyed were around 3x more likely to have received both a promotion and pay raise in the past year compared to employees who have been slow to adopt these tools, according to Dan Schawbel, managing partner at Workplace Intelligence1
. Veldran advises using AI to take work out of the system while not ceding all human judgment to it1
. The opportunity is enormous—employees spend an estimated 2.6 hours every day on tasks that AI could handle, translating to more than $2.9 trillion in potential efficiency gains annually in the US alone3
.Summarized by
Navi
[2]
18 Jun 2025•Business and Economy

09 Apr 2026•Entertainment and Society

13 Nov 2024•Technology

1
Technology

2
Business and Economy

3
Health
