8 Sources
[1]
Microsoft literally wants to 'make people addicted' to AI
This language comes amid heightened scrutiny over AI dependency. People have grown increasingly reliant on AI assistants such as ChatGPT and Gemini. In fact, it's not uncommon to hear about people being glued to their AI chatbots for even the most mundane reasons. Now, it turns out that addiction is a very deliberate goal for one major company's AI assistant. Microsoft has just announced Scout, a new agentic AI assistant powered by OpenClaw. However, internal documents uncovered by 404 Media show that the company explicitly wants to "make people addicted" to the service. The internal documents include a subheading titled 'ClawPilot Overall Plan.' ClawPilot was the name of Scout prior to its launch. There are three phases under this subheading, with the first one titled 'Make people addicted.' 404 Media reports that the other phases see Scout/ClawPilot connecting to more AI services, as well as gaining new features. "We're seeing more and more addiction happening with AI chatbots and agents and overall addiction to me is something no product should be making a part of its build strategy," an unnamed Microsoft employee told the outlet. "It feels like one of those 'saying the quiet part out loud' moments in the document." It's no surprise to hear that a company literally wants to make people addicted to its service. After all, many social and AI platforms include user engagement as a key internal metric. That is, the more time people spend using these services, the better. These companies often roll out features and UI changes with the express aim of keeping people on their platforms for longer. Indeed, another unnamed Microsoft employee suggested to the outlet that all major tech companies had the ultimate goal of making software that's addictive. However, it seems like most of these major tech companies don't explicitly say they're trying to get people addicted to their service (at least not publicly). And this leaked language also comes amid increased scrutiny over AI chatbot dependency. A recent study has also found that they can fuel delusions among vulnerable people. While Scout is an agentic tool rather than a general AI chatbot, we can understand if the focus on making people addicted still makes you think twice about the firm's other AI endeavors.
[2]
Satya Nadella 'Not Sure' Who Said Microsoft Wanted to Make Addictive AI, Is Looking for Guy Who Did This
Microsoft's CEO seems unaware of what's going on at his own company. On Tuesday, we published an article about an internal Microsoft strategy document that explained the company wanted to "make people addicted" to its new AI assistant, Scout. Thursday, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella told staff that he was "not sure what this document is or who is writing and leaking this nonsense," according to a message obtained by The Information. The document we reported on was not some random document. As we wrote at the time, the strategy document was written by Microsoft executives Omar Shahine, Jakob Werner, and some sort of AI writing tool. This information is in our original article and is readily available to Nadella. We wrote: "The document seen by 404 Media lists Shahine and another executive, Jakob Werner, as its authors. The document itself, however, notes that it was 'co-created turn-by-turn with AI. Human verified every sentence.'" Shahine is the leader of Microsoft's Scout project, as he has written numerous times on his own blog, on his LinkedIn, and on Microsoft's own announcement of the software. In attempting to distance himself from his own company's executives and strategy documents, Nadella has revealed that he either does not know how to read or does not know what is happening with some of the company's highest-profile products. Phase one of the company's launch plan for Scout, which was previously called ClawPilot internally, was to "make people addicted. Continue shipping the standalone ClawPilot experience. Pilot the UX, grow the user base, and build the skill and tool ecosystem that makes people depend on it daily. This is already happening organically." In Nadella's message to staff reported by The Information Thursday, he wrote "this is absolutely a non goal! If anything we are doing the exact opposite. We want to make sure AI empowers and adds real value to human endeavor and broad economic growth! We should make sure that our teams are clear about this. Not sure what this document is or who is writing and leaking this nonsense! They may want to go work elsewhere....." Nadella then linked to an aggregation of our article published by Futurism. As mentioned, the document was written by Shahine. Shahine is not some random Microsoft employee, he is the person who imagined, pitched, and brought Scout to fruition, as he has tirelessly documented over and over and over again in many, many LinkedIn posts and on his personal blog. His job title is "Corporate Vice President of Microsoft Scout," and he is the person who announced the product on Microsoft's official blog. His biography on Microsoft's website is "Omar Shahine is a Corporate Vice President at Microsoft where he leads Microsoft Scout." Again, Shahine's name is listed as the author at the top of the document we reported on. Nadella's message and a statement given by Microsoft to The Information by a spokesperson are instructive in showing in the ways that big tech deals with journalists who deign to write articles that the companies would rather not exist. A Microsoft spokesperson told The Information Scout is for "helping people accomplish tasks more effectively -- not encouraging dependency. Our goal isn't more screen time. It's more time back." Microsoft did not say this to us; Microsoft said nothing to us. Before we published this article, as we do with almost every article that mentions any company, we reached out to Microsoft for comment. We specifically said that we were writing an article about the "make people addicted" language and asked for comment, context, and more information about that language. Microsoft did not answer our questions, ignored the fact that we asked about "addiction," and simply sent us a link to its public announcement for Scout. The company then attacked our report internally and externally to another media outlet. If Nadella is Looking For the Guy Who Did This, maybe he should read the documents his own company produces, or ask the guy who made it.
[3]
In Leaked Document, Microsoft Plots How to Get People "Addicted" to Its AI
Can't-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Some copywriter at Microsoft is getting a real stern talking to. In an internal document obtained by 404 Media, the tech giant let slip that it wants to "make people addicted" to its new personal assistant AI agent, Scout -- an alarming admission, given that AI companies have tirelessly fought against the criticism that they design their models to be as engaging as possible, to the point of being psychologically harmful and fueling mental health crises. The document, which outlines Microsoft's plan to embed a more mainstream and accessible version of OpenClaw AI agents in its Microsoft 365 software suite, describes "three phases" to its approach. The first: "Make people addicted." "Continue shipping the standalone ClawPilot experience. Pilot the UX, grow the user base, and build the skill and tool ecosystem that makes people depend on it daily. This is already happening organically," the document states. Anonymous Microsoft employees who spoke to 404 were mixed on the language. One called its explicit references to addiction "very troubling." "We're seeing more and more addiction happening with AI chatbots and agents and overall addiction to me is something no product should be making a part of its build strategy," they said. "It feels like one of those 'saying the quiet part out loud' moments in the document." But another countered, rationalizing that "isn't the end goal of all software made by all major technology companies to be addicting?" "Luckily for us," they japed, "Microsoft is pretty bad at making addicting products compared to some of the other big companies." If Microsoft's goal is to indeed make its AI addictive, the first people getting hooked are from its own workforce, with the document claiming that more than 1,000 employees, including CEO Satya Nadella, are using the new tool. "ClawPilot has organically grown into one of the most requested internal tools at Microsoft. No formal announcement, no marketing, no org-wide push," it states. (After reading that sludgy prose, you probably won't be surprised to hear that the document was "co-created" with AI, the document notes.) Addiction has become one of those scary words in the AI industry. Because AI chatbots and other tools communicate in natural, conversational language -- with an extra infusion of sycophancy throughout -- users can become unhealthily attached to them, and the question becomes whether the companies building them are knowingly playing into this to drive engagement despite the cognitive and mental health risks. For Microsoft to outright claim addiction is its endgame is at best tone deaf, and at worst dangerously cynical.
[4]
Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to its New AI Assistant, Internal Documents Reveal
Planning documents for "Scout" say the plan is to "make people addicted" to the tool before adding new features. An internal Microsoft strategy document says that the plan for its just-announced "Scout" personal assistant AI is to "make people addicted" to the tool before rolling out additional functionality, 404 Media has learned. "Three phases from addictive app to agentic platform," the documentation. Microsoft has been piloting Scout as an internal tool for employees it was calling "ClawPilot," since March. ClawPilot -- and now Scout -- are part of "Project Lobster," which is a Microsoft plan to bring the popular OpenClaw AI tool to its Microsoft 365 suite of products in a way that nontechnical people can use. It is not particularly notable that Microsoft is developing new AI tools -- the company has reoriented almost everything it does to focus on AI, and every major AI company has tried to figure out how to bring AI agents into their products after OpenClaw went viral earlier this year. OpenClaw allows users to create AI agents that can act on behalf of the person using it; it can send emails, edit calendars, publish blog posts, and more. What is notable is that the explicit goal of the people developing the product is to addict its users. Microsoft officially announced Scout Tuesday as an "always-on personal agent" that runs on OpenClaw and is integrated into Microsoft 365. The internal Microsoft document, called "ClawPilot: Overview and Plan with Project Lobster," seen by 404 Media has a subheading called "ClawPilot Overall Plan," which notes "three phases" to its launch plan. The first phase is "Make people addicted." "Continue shipping the standalone ClawPilot experience. Pilot the UX, grow the user base, and build the skill and tool ecosystem that makes people depend on it daily. This is already happening organically," the document says. Omar Shahine, the Microsoft executive leading the project, adds that in its pilot with Microsoft employees, they have seen "Daily Usage with High Retention and intensity of usage (chats, queries, workflows, skills)." The additional phases of the plan involve connecting ClawPilot to other AI tools and eventually adding new features. A Microsoft employee familiar with ClawPilot told 404 Media that the addiction language was "very troubling." "We're seeing more and more addiction happening with AI chatbots and agents and overall addiction to me is something no product should be making a part of its build strategy," they said. "It feels like one of those 'saying the quiet part out loud' moments in the document." Another employee said that, at this point, they feel "isn't the end goal of all software made by all major technology companies to be addicting? Luckily for us, Microsoft is pretty bad at making addicting products compared to some of the other big companies." 404 Media granted Microsoft employees anonymity to talk about private internal products and documents. The project is being driven by Shahine, a longtime Microsoft executive who wrote on his personal blog and LinkedIn in April that he created a personal AI assistant called Lobster using OpenClaw, the viral open source AI agent tool. According to his blog, Shahine presented his "Lobster" AI assistant to an internal Microsoft AI accelerator program and was told to turn it into a real product for Microsoft. The document seen by 404 Media lists Shahine and another executive, Jakob Werner, as its authors. The document itself, however, notes that it was "co-created turn-by-turn with AI. Human verified every sentence." The document describes ClawPilot as "a desktop personal assistant primarily built for knowledge workers: people in finance, legal, operations, HR, and other roles who have never heard of OpenClaw and will never open a terminal. It is a macOS and Windows app that sits alongside you, learns how you work, and acts on your behalf. It manages your calendar, triages your inbox, files expenses, prepares meetings, and runs recurring workflows." The document states that more than 1,000 employees at Microsoft are using it, including CEO Satya Nadella and that "ClawPilot has organically grown into one of the most requested internal tools at Microsoft. No formal announcement, no marketing, no org-wide push." Shahine has posted several times on his personal blog and LinkedIn about ClawPilot, including screenshots of the tool. Another Microsoft internal document about ClawPilot explains that it both enhances what employees are doing and acts as an assistant they can hand work to. "It is not a smarter chatbot. IT takes actions on a real desktop, and it keeps working when you are not watching," the document says. When 404 Media asked Microsoft for comment about the addiction language on its internal documentation, we were sent a blog post by Shahine announcing Scout published Tuesday. Nadella previously said at a conference that he loves OpenClaw, but that Microsoft could not ever integrate OpenClaw into Microsoft products: "I can't launch OpenClaw as Microsoft. I mean, it, you know, it just wouldn't work. I don't have permission to do that because that would be considered Microsoft launching a virus. I mean, that's just not a thing." Like OpenClaw itself, ClawPilot requires access to important accounts and files in order to function. The document notes that "security and compliance" are important things to figure out moving forward. Microsoft's AI products have been a bit of a mixed bag. Microsoft's partnership with OpenAI gave it a huge head start in the AI space, and its coding tool, Copilot, has been very popular but has been surpassed by Claude Code. The company has tried to push AI into many of its products, and users have revolted over AI tools integrated into Windows.
[5]
Leak Reveals Microsoft Wants Its AI To Be 'Addictive'
The new 'AI personal assistant' Scout has apparently already hooked its own employees On Tuesday of this week Microsoft made public its latest AI endeavor, Scout. On the same day, 404 Media published a leaked internal strategy document it had sourced from within Microsoft, in which it is written that the corporation's immediate intention for Scout is to "make people addicted." After 404's damning reveal, tech news site The Information followed this up with a denial from Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella in which the boss feigned disbelief, saying that he was "not sure what this document is or who is writing and leaking this nonsense." 404 has now hit back, pointing out Nadella knows exactly what the document is and exactly which senior members of his staff wrote it -- and one of them is Scout's project lead. Scout (formerly ClawPilot) is Microsoft's latest attempt to create a so-called "personal assistant AI," the current golden calf of AI bullshit, designed to interfere with your attempts to use products like Word, Outlook, Teams and Edge, by reading all your email, online conversations, browsing history and private documents in order to "keep it grounded in your flow of work." The idea is an AI will write your emails, create your spreadsheets, file your invoices, and respond to your staff, all that dreadful stuff that forces you to engage with your job and employees. It's using the techy OpenClaw AI agent tool that went wildly popular among some engineers this year, made more user-friendly to be the latest part of MS's all-consuming AI obsession via Copilot under the ridiculous name of Project Lobster. The internal document revealed by 404 is titled "ClawPilot: Overview and Plan with Project Lobster," and it lists three phases for its launch plans. The first phase is "Make people addicted." Inject it into your veins This addiction, it appears Microsoft hopes, will be achieved by Scout's sheer ubiquity across all its products, such that a user becomes so reliant on it that they "depend on it daily." This has already proven successful with the corp's experiments on its own employees, with "Daily Usage with High Retention and intensity of usage (chats, queries, workflows, skills)" among its staff. And one of those internal lab rats is a Microsoft employee by the name of, oh wait, Satya Nadella. The document, meanwhile, is credited to Microsoft executives Omar Shahine and Jakob Werner, alongside -- inevitably -- AI. And these aren't two backroom employees who went rogue. Omar Shahine is a Corporate Vice President and the creator, pioneer and project lead on Scout. Gosh, look here, the official announcement of Scout on Microsoft's site was written by Omar Shahine. All of which makes Nadella's response, which somehow got into the hands of the very AI-friendly The Information, a little odd. "This is absolutely a non goal!" the CEO bellowed in a message sent to staff. "If anything we are doing the exact opposite," he opined. So they're building an AI they hope everyone will immediately hate and never want to use again? Well, no, it seems the "opposite" of an AI that makes people addicted is an AI that "empowers and adds real value to human endeavor and broad economic growth!" (Exclamation point his own.) After expressing his complete disbelief that such a document could have been written, Nadella adds that the elusive and mysterious authors "may want to go work elsewhere." Scream time 404 goes on to note that Microsoft gave the site no response whatsoever, but instead disparaged the site's reporting in the internal damage control memo, along with a close to meaningless statement from a Microsoft spokesperson sent to a friendly outlet. Microsoft's Frank Shaw told The Information that Scout is for "helping people accomplish tasks more effectively -- not encouraging dependency. Our goal isn't more screen time. It's more time back. As we shared in our announcement, we're taking a thoughtful approach to the rollout -- learning with and from customers as the technology evolves, and ensuring people have clear choice and control in how they engage." Obviously no one was suggesting the product would be "addictive" in the sense that people would be sitting at their desks using it 18 hours a day, jonesing to be back in the office and having it write just one more email. The clear intention of the leaked document is that people would become "addicted" as in dependent. An attempt to obfuscate in this way, were it sent as a response to a site like 404, would have been ridiculed. We have, of course, reached out to Microsoft for clarity regarding all these apparent contradictions. This is all a very transparent attempt at damage control, following the embarrassing leak and accompanying statements from unnamed Microsoft employees to 404 expressing their dismay and horror at the current internal strategies. It's perhaps very convenient that the internal memo with abject denials and veiled threats got out into public. Of course the goal is to have Scout -- or any other "AI personal assistant" -- be something upon which users become dependent. Meta, Microsoft, Google, Anthropic et al are all risking impossible billions on this idiot competition to see who can win the AI race and leave all the others to look responsible for the unavoidable global recession to follow. There are only two possible business models for recouping any of these costs, and one is hooking an audience to the point of no return and then making them pay massive prices to continue using the products. (We're seeing exactly that right now as tools like Claude and Copilot have suddenly massively hiked costs for programmers.) The other is to take all the colossal amounts of private data that have been harvested in the process and sell it to advertisers.
[6]
Get Users Addicted to Microsoft Scout - Satya Nadella Disagrees but...
The original memo was quoted to the team leader who worked on Scout, but Nadella claims he has no clue where it came from Earlier this week, reports quoting an internal strategy document surfaced claiming that the Microsoft wanted to "make people addicted" to its new agentic AI product called Microsoft Scout. Now, CEO Satya Nadella shared a memo rebuking the original document and adding that this was "absolutely a non-goal." According to a report by The Information, Nadella shared a memo to about 50 of Microsoft's top engineers working on AI products rebuking the original memo. "This is absolutely a non-goal! If anything we are doing the exact opposite. We want to make sure AI empowers and adds real value to human endeavour and broad economic growth! We should make our teams clear about this," Nadella said. He attached a copy of the original report carried by 404 Media that linked to a note sent by Microsoft Corporate VP Oman Shahine where he outlined plans to develop Scout in "three phases from addictive app to agentic platform." Company spokesperson Frank Shaw proffered a statement claiming Scout is for "helping people accomplish tasks more effectively and not encouraging dependency." Informatively, Shahine has led the team developing Scout based on the opensource OpenClaw AI agent software. This was announced by Microsoft publicly at their Build conference last Tuesday. However, Nadella's note raises questions about the note and even its veracity. "Not sure what this document is or who is writing and leaking this nonsense! They may want to go work elsewhere," Nadella says in his memo. However, the publishers of the original memo - 404 Media - are in no mood to relent. In a new article posted today, 404 Media questions Nadella's memo. "The document we reported on was not some random document. As we wrote at the time, the strategy document was written by Microsoft executives Omar Shahine, Jakob Werner, and some sort of AI writing tool," they said. This information is available in our original article and is readily available to Nadella where Shahine and Werner were the authors. Additionally the document also notes that it was "co-created turn-by-turn with AI. Humans verified every sentence." The article further castigates Nadella for attempting to distance himself from his company executives and strategy documents. "Shahine is the leader of Microsoft's Scout project, as he has written numerous times on his own blog, on his LinkedIn, and on Microsoft's own announcement of the software," the article says. By seeking to distance himself, Nadella has revealed that he either does not know how to read or does not know what is happening with some of the company's highest-profile products, the report by 404 media said. The same report goes on to clarify that Microsoft's launch plan for Scout, previously named ClawPilot, was indeed to "make people addicted. Continue shipping the standalone ClawPilot experience. Pilot the UX, grow the user base, and build the skill and tool ecosystem that makes people depend on it daily. This is already happening organically." Finally, 404 Media also clarified that as was regularly the case, they had reached out to Microsoft for comment. "We specifically said that we were writing an article about the "make people addicted" language and asked for comment, context, and more information about that language. Microsoft did not answer our questions, ignored the fact that we asked about "addiction," and simply sent us a link to its public announcement for Scout. The company then attacked our report internally and externally to another media outlet." Makes us wonder whether Nadella needs to find the Satya (truth) before he makes statements. And if they are contrary to what some of his colleagues have said before, he needs to fix it internally and then share his views with the world.
[7]
Microsoft's Satya Nadella slams company exec for outlining plan to 'make people addicted' to Scout AI tool
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella slammed one of the software giant's own executives for outlining a plan to "make people addicted" to a new AI tool called "Scout." The rebuke from Nadella, which was posted on an internal message board, included a link to a report by tech news outlet 404 Media, which obtained a copy of a memo written by Microsoft corporate vice president Omar Shahine. In the memo, Shahine - who is leading the team responsible for building "Scout" - outlined a three-phase plan to transform the tool from "from addictive app to agentic platform." The first phase of the plan was to "make people addicted" by adding features that make "people depend on it daily." "This is absolutely a non goal! If anything we are doing the exact opposite. We want to make sure AI empowers and adds real value to human endeavor and broad economic growth! We should make our teams clear about this," Nadella wrote in the message, which was sent to about 50 of Microsoft's top software engineers, according to The Information. "Not sure what this document is or who is writing and leaking this nonsense! They may want to go work elsewhere," Nadella added. The Post reached out to Microsoft for further comment. Microsoft unveiled plans for "Scout" at its "Build" conference in San Francisco earlier this week. The company also published a blog post, which listed Shanine as the author and described Scout as "your always-on personal agent." "Microsoft Scout reduces the coordination work that builds throughout the day," the blog post said. "It can proactively schedule and coordinate meeting times across time zones, flag important meetings, and generate the materials you need to prepare while keeping you in the loop." The tool is a key part of Microsoft's overall strategy as it looks to implement AI across its widely-used productivity software. Nadella's remarks surfaced during a particularly sensitive time for tech companies, which are spending billions to roll out advanced chatbots and AI models despite mounting scrutiny from regulators, who have expressed alarm about their potential harm and addictive features. Mark Zuckerberg's Meta, which is competing against Microsoft and others in the AI race, recently lost a pair of high-profile lawsuits centered on social media addiction and online harm. One anonymous Microsoft employee told 404 Media that the leaked document was "very troubling." "We're seeing more and more addiction happening with AI chatbots and agents and overall addiction to me is something no product should be making a part of its build strategy," the employee said. "It feels like one of those 'saying the quiet part out loud' moments in the document."
[8]
Microsoft wants to make users AI addict with its new assistant Scout: All details
Microsoft announced Scout, its new always-on AI agent at Build 2026 this week. But internal documents uncovered by 404 Media reveal that the strategy behind Scout is more candid than most product roadmaps tend to be. A document titled 'ClawPilot: Overview and Plan with Project Lobster' outlines three phases for Scout's rollout, with the first phase explicitly labelled 'Make people addicted.' Scout, previously known internally as ClawPilot, is part of Project Lobster, Microsoft's effort to bring the viral open-source OpenClaw AI agent technology into its Microsoft 365 suite of products in a form accessible to non-technical users. It is integrated with Teams, Outlook, OneDrive and SharePoint and is described in the documents as a desktop assistant for knowledge workers in finance, legal, HR and operations who 'have never heard of OpenClaw and will never open a terminal.' More than 1,000 Microsoft employees, including CEO Satya Nadella, are reportedly using it internally. The document, co-authored by Microsoft executive Omar Shahine and colleague Jakob Werner, states under phase one titled 'Make people addicted' to "Continue shipping the standalone ClawPilot experience. Pilot the UX, grow the user base, and build the skill and tool ecosystem that makes people depend on it daily. This is already happening organically." Shahine noted in the same document that early internal usage had shown "daily usage with high retention and intensity of usage." Not everyone inside Microsoft was comfortable with the framing. One employee told 404 Media the addiction language was "very troubling," adding that making addiction part of a product's build strategy is something no product should do. A second employee took a more passive view, suggesting that making software addictive is ultimately the goal of every major technology company, something that Microsoft has historically been less effective at than some of its peers. This revelation adds an uncomfortable dimension to the broader conversation around AI chatbot dependency, which has been building on for months now. A study published in The Lancet Psychiatry found that AI chatbots can fuel delusional thinking in vulnerable users. Scout is an agentic tool rather than a general chatbot, but the underlying dynamic, designing for compulsive daily reliance, is the same.
Share
Copy Link
Internal Microsoft strategy documents show the company explicitly planned to 'make people addicted' to its new Scout AI assistant. CEO Satya Nadella later claimed he didn't know who wrote the documents, despite them being authored by Scout's project lead Omar Shahine. The controversy highlights growing concerns about AI dependency and whether tech companies deliberately design products to maximize user engagement at psychological cost.
Internal Microsoft strategy documents obtained by 404 Media reveal that the company's explicit first-phase goal for its Scout AI assistant was to "make people addicted" to the service
1
. The leaked internal documents, titled "ClawPilot: Overview and Plan with Project Lobster," outline three phases for the Scout AI assistant launch, with phase one clearly stating the objective to "make people addicted"4
. This language appears under a subheading called "ClawPilot Overall Plan," which was the internal name for Scout before its public announcement.
Source: Futurism
The documents specify that Microsoft wants to make people addicted by continuing to ship the standalone ClawPilot experience, growing the user base, and building a skill and tool ecosystem that makes people depend on it daily
4
. According to the strategy, this addiction is "already happening organically" among the more than 1,000 Microsoft employees testing the tool internally, including CEO Satya Nadella3
.Microsoft's new AI assistant Scout represents the company's effort to bring the popular OpenClaw AI agent tool to its Microsoft 365 suite of products in a way that knowledge workers can use without technical expertise
4
. The agentic AI assistant is designed as an "always-on personal agent" that manages calendars, triages inboxes, files expenses, prepares meetings, and runs recurring workflows for people in finance, legal, operations, HR, and other roles who have never heard of OpenClaw4
.
Source: 404 Media
The project originated when Omar Shahine, a Corporate Vice President at Microsoft, created a personal AI assistant called Lobster using OpenClaw and presented it to an internal Microsoft AI accelerator program
4
. Shahine now leads the Scout project and is listed as one of the authors of the leaked strategy documents alongside executive Jakob Werner. Notably, the document itself states it was "co-created turn-by-turn with AI. Human verified every sentence"4
.After 404 Media published its investigation, Satya Nadella sent a message to Microsoft staff claiming he was "not sure what this document is or who is writing and leaking this nonsense," according to reporting by The Information
2
. Nadella stated that making AI addictive is "absolutely a non goal" and suggested the document's authors "may want to go work elsewhere"2
.
Source: CXOToday
However, the document's authorship is clearly attributed to Omar Shahine, who is not only the Corporate Vice President leading Microsoft Scout but also the person who announced the product on Microsoft's official blog
2
. Microsoft provided no response to 404 Media before publication but issued a statement to The Information claiming Scout is for "helping people accomplish tasks more effectively -- not encouraging dependency"5
.Related Stories
The controversy emerges amid heightened scrutiny over AI dependency and whether companies deliberately design products to maximize user engagement despite potential psychological harm
1
. An unnamed Microsoft employee told 404 Media that the addiction language was "very troubling," stating that "addiction to me is something no product should be making a part of its build strategy"4
. The employee characterized it as "one of those 'saying the quiet part out loud' moments in the document"1
.While many social and AI platforms track user engagement as a key internal metric, most major tech companies avoid explicitly stating they're trying to get people addicted to their services, at least not publicly
1
. Another Microsoft employee acknowledged to 404 Media that "isn't the end goal of all software made by all major technology companies to be addicting?" though they added that "Microsoft is pretty bad at making addicting products compared to some of the other big companies"4
. Recent studies have found that AI chatbots can fuel delusions among vulnerable people, raising questions about whether Microsoft AI and similar tools knowingly play into unhealthy attachment patterns to drive engagement1
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
[4]
22 Jun 2026•Technology

22 Dec 2025•Business and Economy

20 Sept 2025•Business and Economy

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
