White House proposes blocking state AI laws for 3 years in exchange for online safety legislation

3 Sources

Share

The White House is negotiating with Congress to bundle federal preemption of state AI laws with three online safety bills. The package would freeze state-level AI regulations for three years in exchange for passing KOSA, the NO FAKES Act, and age verification requirements. Free speech advocates warn the deal could fundamentally reshape internet access while states continue accelerating AI oversight.

White House Revives Federal Preemption Strategy Through Legislative Deal

The White House is pursuing a new strategy to override state AI laws by bundling federal preemption with popular online safety legislation, according to reports from Axios

2

. Senator Marsha Blackburn is spearheading negotiations to finalize legislative text that would block state-level AI regulations for three years while advancing the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), the NO FAKES Act, and federal age verification mandates

1

. This marks the administration's third attempt to strip states of AI regulatory authority after Congress rejected similar efforts twice earlier this year, including a 99-1 Senate vote removing preemption from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

1

.

Source: Axios

Source: Axios

The legislative deal represents a calculated shift in approach. Rather than pursuing standalone federal preemption, the administration is attaching it to bipartisan measures with broad appeal. KOSA would require social media platforms to restrict content deemed harmful to minors, granting enforcement powers to the Federal Trade Commission

1

. The NO FAKES Act aims to deliver protections against deepfakes by safeguarding individuals from AI-generated impersonation of their likeness

3

. Age verification requirements would mandate identity checks across online services, raising concerns about anonymous internet access.

States Accelerate AI Regulation Amid Federal Vacuum

The timing of these negotiations comes as states have dramatically accelerated their own AI oversight efforts. In 2025 alone, state legislatures introduced 1,208 AI bills and enacted 145 of them

1

. Progressive states are moving to restrict AI data centre construction and hold tech companies liable for harms their AI systems cause. This surge in state activity highlights the regulatory vacuum at the federal level that states are actively filling. The administration frames federal preemption as necessary for national competitiveness, but critics argue it would remove the most active layer of AI oversight precisely when state-level AI regulations are proving most responsive

1

.

A Blackburn spokesperson clarified the package would implement "subject-matter preemption" rather than blanket prohibition, meaning states would only be barred from legislating on specific areas addressed by the federal framework

3

. The proposal would also formally establish a Center for AI Standards and Innovation and require certain developers to address risks before releasing models

1

.

Free Speech Concerns and Anonymous Internet Access

Free speech organizations have raised alarm about the bundled legislation's potential impact. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression warned that "taken together, these bills would fundamentally change the internet as we know it"

1

. FIRE argues KOSA would grant the FTC expansive power to hold platforms accountable for lawful speech, while age verification would effectively eliminate anonymous internet use. The Intercept reported that KOSA's age verification requirements would make anonymous browsing nearly impossible, a concern spanning the political spectrum

1

.

The legislation would give whichever administration controls the FTC significant leverage over platform content moderation affecting roughly 71% of US adults who regularly use Instagram alone

1

. This concentration of regulatory power raises questions about online safety for children versus broader civil liberties.

Uncertain Path Forward in Congress

Whether this legislative deal can pass remains uncertain as August recess approaches in an election year

2

. The maneuvering suggests a bipartisan proposal from Representatives Jay Obernolte and Lori Trahan is unlikely to become the primary vehicle for AI regulation this Congress

2

. That bill would also preempt state AI laws for three years while establishing risk mitigation requirements for AI developers.

Source: The Hill

Source: The Hill

Blackburn's support marks a crucial shift, as the White House previously lacked her backing when Republicans faced pushback from advocacy groups and state lawmakers across the country

2

. The revival follows Trump signing an AI and cyber executive order that includes voluntary pre-deployment testing of frontier models

2

. However, intraparty and partisan debates, along with fierce opposition from AI safety advocates, have delayed movement while the Senate and House remain misaligned on a path forward

3

.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved