5 Sources
[1]
CEOs: AI Isn't Helping Us Make Money, But It's Required to Remain Relevant
Less than a third of CEOs polled in a recent PWC survey said their companies have generated additional revenue from AI, and only a quarter have realized cost savings from it. Most companies that reduced costs saw little increase in revenue, and for many, increased revenue from AI use also led to
[2]
Deloitte sees enterprises adopting AI without revenue lift
Making money isn't everything ... at least not when it comes to AI. Research from professional services firm Deloitte shows that, for most companies, adopting AI tools hasn't helped the bottom line at all. But researchers still sing the technology's praises. According to Deloitte's "State of AI in
[3]
AI hype meets reality as majority of CEOs report no financial returns
Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. Bottom line: Despite being advertised as the holy grail for businesses, embracing AI doesn't mean a company will automatically experience improvements. A new survey that questioned thousands of CEOs
[4]
Majority of CEOs report zero payoff from AI splurge
PwC survey finds more than half of 4,500+ biz leaders see no revenue growth nor cost savings More than half of CEOs report seeing neither increased revenue nor decreased costs from AI, despite massive investments in the technology, according to a PwC survey of 4,454 business leaders. The findings
[5]
CEOs want to spend more on AI - but they aren't seeing any big returns just yet
PwC calls for clearer goals and readiness to adapt as the landscape changes New research has claimed that while four in five (81%) CEOs are now prioritizing technology, AI and data investments, up from three in five (60%) in 2025, many are still not seeing the returns they'd hoped for. Barely one
Share
Copy Link
A PwC CEO survey of 4,454 business leaders across 95 countries reveals that 56% of companies see no revenue growth or cost savings from AI. Only 12% report both increased revenue and reduced costs. Despite lackluster returns, 69% of CEOs say generative AI will require workforce upskilling, yet fewer than half have clear plans. The findings suggest companies are adopting AI mainly for maintaining market relevance rather than proven financial gains.
The latest PwC CEO survey has delivered a sobering reality check for the AI industry. Out of 4,454 CEOs polled across 95 countries and territories, a striking 56% report seeing neither revenue growth nor cost savings from their AI investment
1
4
. Only 12% of business leaders reported experiencing both lower costs and higher revenue as a result of their AI initiatives3
. These numbers paint a stark picture of AI adoption being driven less by proven returns and more by the fear of falling behind competitors.
Source: TechRadar
The financial returns breakdown reveals further complexity. While 30% of CEOs reported increased revenue from AI in recent months, 26% saw reduced costs, but nearly as many—22%—experienced cost increases
1
4
. This represents a modest improvement from an October Boston Consulting Group survey where only 5% of companies reported benefits from AI, but the overall impact remains limited1
.Separate research from Deloitte's "State of AI in the Enterprise" report echoes these concerning trends. Among 3,235 business and IT leaders surveyed globally, 74% of organizations want their AI initiatives to grow revenue, but only 20% have actually seen that happen
2
. The consultancy argues that success with AI isn't just about boosting efficiency or revenue, but rather achieving strategic differentiation and a lasting competitive edge2
.
Source: The Register
Despite widespread access to enterprise AI tools—now available to under 60% of workers, up from 40% a year ago—fewer than 60% of these AI-enabled workers actually use the tools as part of their daily workflow
2
. This suggests that while access is widening, the productivity and innovation potential of AI remains largely untapped. Current AI adoption remains limited even in top use cases, with only 22% using it for demand generation, 20% for support services, and 19% for product development4
.The disconnect between AI ambitions and organizational readiness is particularly evident in workforce preparation. Around 69% of CEOs believe generative AI will require most of their workforce to develop new skills within the next three years, yet fewer than half say their companies have a clear plan in place to reskill employees at scale
1
3
. This gap between recognizing the need for workforce upskilling and having actionable plans represents a critical vulnerability for companies betting on AI-driven transformation.
Source: PC Magazine
In the UK specifically, only one in four CEOs believe they can attract high-quality AI talent, far below the 42% global average
5
. Additionally, about 84% of companies surveyed by Deloitte have not redesigned roles based on AI capabilities, despite expectations that 36% of companies will see at least 10% of jobs fully automated within a year2
.Related Stories
Despite the lackluster financial returns, CEOs aren't pulling back from AI. Nearly three-quarters expect it to significantly boost profitability over the next 12 months, and 81% of CEOs are now prioritizing technology, AI and data investments, up from 60% in 2025
3
5
. This suggests maintaining market relevance and competitive positioning outweighs immediate financial concerns.PwC claims that companies with strong "AI foundations"—including responsible AI frameworks, governance models, and technology environments supporting enterprise-wide integration—are two to three times more likely to report meaningful financial returns
3
. However, only 21% of companies report having a mature governance model in place for autonomous agents2
.Looking ahead, pilot projects appear poised to move into production at scale. Currently, 25% of organizations have shifted 40% or more of their AI experiments into live use, and that number is expected to reach 54% within the next three to six months
2
. Whether this acceleration will finally deliver the promised financial returns, or simply represent another chapter in tech-driven FOMO, remains to be seen3
.Summarized by
Navi
[2]
[4]
16 Dec 2025•Business and Economy

08 May 2026•Business and Economy

18 Feb 2026•Business and Economy

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Technology

3
Technology
